qos: (Autumn Queen)
[x-posted]


Who Are You?
1:45 from the Babylon-5 episode "Comes the Inquisitor."



Processing The Question )
qos: (Wading in Water)
We define ourselves, in part, by the stories we tell about ourselves. We choose certain aspects of ourselves and make them prominent by the way we privelege them in how we talk about ourselves to others -- and in our own internal dialogue.

Long-time friends may remember that several years ago one of the primary features of my story of myself was that I was a woman whose heart had been badly broken twice in quick succession, and who never expected to love again. One day, while making an entry here, I realized I was tired of that story. I didn't feel an active desire to be in a relationship again, but I knew I didn't want that to be my story anymore. I stopped telling that story to myself or to others.

Not too many months later, [livejournal.com profile] _storyteller_, with [livejournal.com profile] uncrowned_king looking over his shoulder, left his first comment on my journal, starting me on the road to not one but two amazing loves.

This morning I wrote an entry that at the last moment I decided to make private. It wasn't anything super-secret or extremely decliate. It was stuff I've posted about frequently before -- and that was the trouble. I realized that I was tired of telling certain stories about myself, tired of living certain narratives that trap me in pain and frustration.

I need to change some of my stories. It's time to stop telling the story of a woman with a Masters Degree trapped in a day job that gives her no satisfaction. It's time to stop telling the story of grief over my lover's death. It's time to stop telling the story of the reluctant mother.

It's time to start telling the story of the priestess and spiritual director and author. It's time to start telling the story of the woman who has been blessed with a love that transcends time and space and the material world. It's time to start telling the story of the amazing relationship I have with my terrific daughter.


Careful the tale you tell, that is the spell warns the Witch in Sondheim's "Into the Woods" -- and it's the truth.

The facts of my life are no different at this moment than they were two hours ago. But I'm telling a new story -- which means I'm creating a whole new world for myself to inhabit and I'm shaping a whole new destiny.



What stories are you telling about yourself?
Are you telling the story of the person you really want to be?
qos: (Elena QoS  by just_sleeping)
In my previous entry I shared how both Wolfling and I expressed a desire to "grow up to be Michelle Yeoh."

[livejournal.com profile] athenian_abroad's response included the following:

My first reaction: "You don't have to be a girl to want to be Michelle Yeoh (or a Michelle Yeoh character)!"

Which brings up a question. How common -- or uncommon -- is it to "identify" with characters, etc., across gender lines? How does that relate to intuitions about whether gender is an essential or incidental quality? How does it relate to the fluidity or solidity of one's own gender identity?


I thought this was a great question. It's also one I'm having a hard time grappling with effectively, because this isn't an area which I think about all that much.

Personally, while I certainly enjoy the exploits of heroic male characters, I tend to only identify with -- or want to explicitly emulate -- female characters. I think Chow Yun-Fat can bring to the screen many of the same qualities as Yeoh: physically beautiful, a sense of wisdom, a regal air, a believable warrior. (I'm thinking of him in Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon and Anna and the King.) But I don't ever want to be him or his characters. I want to bed them, not be them.

When I play RPG's, I never even consider playing a male character unless I'm a GM running male NPC's. As a writer, my primary characters have all been female, even though my most significant creative work has a large number of male supporting characters. When I explore archetypes, I avoid the small number of them which I perceive as being explicitly male. For example: I am always the Queen, never the King.

I've written and deleted at least four different paragraphs here, trying to sort out the way and the degree to which I experience myself as feminine and masculine. . . and I just can't find the words. Maybe all I can say right now is this: I identify as utterly female on a basic biological level, but enjoy having (traditionally) masculine qualities. Indeed, the Queen of Swords symbol is an expression of a mature woman with strong masculine attributes.

Perhaps it's a bit paradoxical. I embrace my masculine attributes while being absolutely comfortable with my physical femaleness. Or maybe I just don't think in those terms very often because I've never had trouble with my gender experience or identity on an internal or social level. I've played with a lot of different aspects of identity, but gender has never been one of them. I've never felt that being physically female has limited my ability to express who I am, whether that expression is considered masculine or feminine. At the same time, on some level I evidently perceive some kind of essential difference between Male and Female that goes beyond biology because I can't/don't identify with male individuals.

Disclaimer: these are all my subjective experiences as an individual. I have no interest in judging the experiences of others, which I know can be radically different from mine.


Please chime in. I'd be very interested in the expreriences and insights of others. I know that some of you have a very strong interest in gender issues, and there are those here whose own gender experiences are very different from mine.
qos: (9 of Pentacles)
Well, the inventory turned out to be a much more grueling project than I'd realized -- but it was also even more worthwhile. I'm tired this morning, but feel far more settled and together internally than I have in weeks.

I'm sure a big part of this has been the after-effects of my July initiation. If something like that "takes" then everything gets stirred up at a deep level. The fact that my primary realization has been that my entire life must be built around Spirit if I'm going to be happy certainly follows from a priestess initiation.

For the next couple of days I'm focusing on getting Wolfling grounded in junior high, then I'll go back through my document and start lifting the pieces I want to prioritize. But before that -- I'm just realizing, as if receiving a tap on the shoulder -- I need to engage in the more subtle process of mapping the interconnections between the various aspects I've indicated as being most fundamental/critical.

Fascinating process. . . .

If anyone has prayers to spare today, Wolfling could use them. Her usually bold spirit is quailing a bit at the prospect of starting junior high, and she can use some extra encouragement and positive energy around her.
qos: (Galadriel Vision)
It's 10 pages long, although the last three pages are an extensive table of To-Do's with emotional reactions, perspective checks, and prioritization. Not all of them are immediate/urgent. A few are fundamental. Some are not urgent in themselves but are important stepping stones to goals or desired states. Some are "a nice idea for an as-yet undetermined time in the future." Sorting out which is which -- and keeping track of it -- is critical.

It's no wonder I feel so frustrated and overwhelmed so often. There’s so much I want to do, so much I think about doing, and it’s impossible to accomplish it all at once. And without organization and discipline nothing gets accomplished. So I feel frustrated and overwhelmed, which means I’m less likely to do anything. . . It's a quick slide down into a vicious circle.

There's so much, and it's all interconnected.

One thing: Spirit is fundamental to all else.
Without that, my life is empty, without meaning.
Everything else hinges on faithfulness to my practices.
Without it, without a deep, consistent connection to Spirit, I'm a shell going through the motions of "making a living" to meet my responsibilties. No joy. No satisfaction.

For my life as a whole, gaps and priorities have been identified, and I've had some additional important insights which I hope will be the springboard for breakthroughs.

More later. . . .

I have to be sure that both Wolfling and I are ready for the new school schedule tomorrow morning.
qos: (Consequences)
I had the pleasure of having [livejournal.com profile] athenian_abroad and our mutual friend Nick as houseguests last weekend. The three of us go waaaay back: Nick and I to 1978, with [livejournal.com profile] athenian_abroad becoming our friend in 1981. Lots of history.

On Sunday morning, Nick slept in very late so [livejournal.com profile] athenian_abroad and I had several hours hours to ourselves to talk, and he had some very good questions and helpful insights about where I am right now and what I want to do. To me, his very presence is inspiring. He's brilliant. Talking to him makes me feel like I really need to gain some clarity in my thinking and become better educated. There are not many people who have that effect on me!

During our conversation I had an important realization: that I've been stalling out on most of my big goals because I'm allowing myself to be derailed by emotional reactions to the tasks/steps instead of allowing my excitement/commitment to the big goal itself to inspire me and move me forward. For example, I know I want more spiritual direction clients. I feel alive, excited, meaningful when I have a session with my one client -- or with a spontaneous direction-like encounter with a friend or stranger, and I would really like to make enough income from my vocation to free me from needing to work a full-time day job -- but it's all too easy to stall out over creating the marketing pieces (business cards, brochures, website, article for local special interest papers) which will actually introduce me and what I do to a wider audience. I say I want more friends, want to get more involved in certain communities, but when activities appear on my calendar I look forward to them for a week but when the time comes I say "I really don't feel like going out."

That's short-sighted. It's childish. I'm letting my "don't wanna" inner kid prevent me from making progress on what I say are important goals.

This is the same inner kid who gets bored with spiritual practice, cooking healthy meals, and getting on the treadmill. She's a spoiled brat -- a real pain! -- and I've been letting her get away with murder, letting her get away with tantrums and obstruction which I would never tolerate from Wolfling. She's pleasure-focused, short-sighted, prefers comfort and indolence to achievement, satisfaction, and meaning. A little of her is good and healthy -- but she's been ruling my life and it's long since time I put her in her proper place. But it's going to be tough to change those habits of thought and choice.

Wolfling is spending this weekend with her dad. I'm going to use the time alone to do the personal inventory I posted about yesterday -- and take a long, serious look at where I am, where I want to be, and what I need to do to get there.

As ever, I return to the quote by Sean Connery from the movie The Untouchables: What are ye prepared ta do?




I know I've made posts like this before and they haven't been followed by much real action. (It's embarrassing.) But I need to keep having the realizations over and over until they stick. I need to keep trying new things, taking the baby steps, if I'm going to get anywhere.
qos: (Sabrina in Tree)
I had a nice, quiet weekend, lightened by a surprisingly enjoyable performance of a melodrama spoof called The Villain's Web at Second Story Rep. I had a good solid sleep last night.

But I woke tired and don't want to go to work.
The fact that my gadget's calendar tells me I have a meeting with Miss V this morning does nothing to enhance my mood.

I didn't work on updating my resume for the training position over the weekend.


Last week at my team's offsite, we worked with our Myers-Brigg's profiles. I'm an INTJ: introverted, intuitive, thinking, judgmental. Which means: I recharge my energy by being alone; I rely more on intuition to process information than simply my five senses and prefer big-picture work rather than being down in the details; I make decisions more by logic and reason than by thinking about relationships and harmony; and I prefer my life to have order and planning rather than be spontaneous.

My day job is better suited for an Extroverted Sensor: someone energized by contact with other people, and who likes focusing on the details. My boss has ADD and is frequently changing plans -- thus requiring me to make a lot of last-minute schedule changes and needing new projects and priorities done before I finsih the previous ones (although, to his credit, he hasn't demanded unreasonable tasks or changes to my own schedule).

On the other hand, my boss is ENTJ, so we relate to each other fairly well. Most of the others on the team are ISTP (all but one), which means that most of us are introverts. Which, when you think about it, makes for an interesting team dynamic. Instead of hanging out together, or going out for lunches, and doing the things that E's do to make the work day more enjoyable, we're all running off alone as often as possible so we can recover from the stress of working an an aggressively "E" company, doing jobs that require us to be actively, productively engaged with other people most of the time.

No wonder I come home drained and the last thing I want to do is a detail-oriented chore like cooking. Or even feel eager to interact with my daughter. I just want some quiet and peace and the freedom to be expansive and abstract.
qos: Catherine McCormack as Veronica Franco in Dangerous Beauty (Veronica Smiling)
Tallman's Archetypes for Spiritual Direction continues to resonate with me and inform my daily choices as I pause to reflect on whether I am acting from a healthy/heroic energy or a Shadow, particularly in the area of the Sovereign and the Abdicator shadow, as it relates to my hearthkeeping.

I continue to play with my perceptions of the archetypes, listing my heroes and heroines in a matrix and checking off which archetypes they model.

The problem was that for several of them, there was something missing. For example, Veronica Franco (as portrayed by Catherine McCormack in the movie Dangerous Beauty -- that's her in the icon on this post) -- is a highly educated courtesan, definitely a Lover. But she's more than that. She takes a stand against her society's treatment of women, and the Church's repression of human sexuality. But it didn't feel right to label her a Warrior. She displayed some of the traits which I associate with the Warrior, but it didn't fit her energy.

After a lot of contemplation, and after looking at the mandala I had been slowly putting together, where I had placed Inanna at the center, I realized that what was missing for me was the Rebel. As Veronica demonstrates, the Rebel has traits in common with the Warrior: a willingness to confront, to resist, to be willing to die for something greater than self. But for me part of the Rebel is simply about being able to see outside the frame, to resist the dominant paradigm, to say "there is another way." I suppose Tallman would call the Rebel a combination of the Seer and the Warrior: one who sees another way and then goes to the mat in the name of those convictions (again, Gandhi comes to mind), but for me, this particular energy/orientation calls for it's own category.

Some of this goes over ground I've covered here before. It seems to be a lesson I need to keep coming back to so I can fully integrate it. )
qos: (Born to Be  by Isis Icon)
I have long been fascinated by archetypes, so I was delighted to have Amazon recommend to me a book called Archetypes for Spiritual Direction: Discovering the Heroes Within, by Bruce Tallman. I've been enjoying it a great deal, getting some insights on my own psyche, and slowly building a conceptual framework of how my own sense of archetypes relate to the role of spiritual director.

Obviously there are many dozens of possible archetypes from which to choose. Tallman has selected the Sovereign, Warrior, Seer and Lover -- and those have been working very well for me, within his context. He does a good job of describing each individually and also illustrating how the four complement and complete each other. Few of his examples are purely of one archetype. For example, he cites Gandhi as a Warrior-Seer, and John of the Cross as both a Seer and a Lover of God. (In fact, his major point is that all four archetypes need to be strong and healthy.)

As valuable as his assessments of the positive aspects of the archetypes is his examination of the dual-aspect shadow of each: the excessive aspect and the under-developed aspect. The shadows of the Sovereign are the Tyrant and the Abdicator; for the Warrior, the Sadist and the Masochist; for the Seer, the Manipulator and the Fool; and for the Lover, the Addict and the Frigid. All of these make gut-level sense to me, and have helped me do some deeper self-assessment in some areas than I have in a while.

The section of the book I'm in now describes how each of the four healthy archetypes functions in the role of spiritual direction, and it's quite fascinating. I can see my own potential for being a Sovereign, but at the moment my strongest aspect is that of Seer -- and just about everything he writes about how the Seer functions as a spiritual director resonates strongly with me.

More behind cut, for those who are interested )

For more than a year now I've been wrestling with my own sacred/mythic identity. A year ago last fall, all the old archetypal references which I had used to define myself stopped working for me. I have yet to fully re-build them, or fully re-imagine myself. This book is very helpful in taking classic archetypes, ones to which I feel a strong connection, and applying them to my relatively-newly-discovered vocation. It's giving me new ways to think about myself and my Work, a new way to name and grapple with the under-developed and/or wounded areas of myself (my Sovereign and Warrior are underdeveloped; my Lover is wounded).

During a very long, slow afternoon at work, I did some mapping of the archetypes to the elements and other symbols, deliberately ignoring many of the traditional -- or personally customary -- associations, and working from my gut. It was very interesting and rewarding.

One thing is very clear: there may be other ways to describe my current psychological state, but saying that my Sovereign, Warrior and Lover archetypes are primarily shadowed, and I need to work on owning/empowering/healing them, is a pretty good way to name the work I need to do. I'm not yet exactly sure what form that work will take, but I've got some ideas.

I'll let you all know how it goes.
qos: (Default)
This has been an interesting topic to ponder the last few days: my emotional perceptions of the difference between these two concepts, and how focusing on one or the other makes me more effective in pursuing what I truly want.

I think "power" is a wonderful word. It sings of potency, of energy, of vast resources. It is formidable not only in itself but in its potential. I have always wanted power: the potent energy to do, to accomplish.

More behind the cut, out of respect for your Friends page ) Then there's "agency," a word that I only recently learned can refer to more than an "organization." A person who has agency is a person who makes choices, and who acts. It is a word of personal sovereignty, of the kind of freedom that transcends external circumstances.

I don't feel "powerful." I very seldom have, for all that I have been blessed with talent and priveleges. But for the past week or so, I have been affirming my own agency again and again and again. And I have been doing. I have been moving forward. I have become more confident, more in control of my own life.

I have never thought of myself as the Cinderella type, waiting for a prince to come and rescue me. But I do seem to have always been waiting for others to drop things in my lap, to present me with opportunities, to draw me out, to encourage me, to enable me. I've been waiting not for a prince, but for my fairy godmother to dress me up, give me my coach, and send me to the ball, where then I could dazzle everyone and win my heart's desire. Lacking a fairy godmother, I gave up on the ball instead of going shopping for a dress and calling a taxi -- or limo service.

Another cut for space )

I don't feel powerful nearly as much as I would like. But I have come to believe in my own agency. I have the freedom to choose, and to act. And that's where the changes are coming from.
qos: Catherine McCormack as Veronica Franco in Dangerous Beauty (Veronica Smiling)
Again following [livejournal.com profile] bookchick. . .

Name 20 of your CURRENT favorite fictional couples, then tag 5 people to do the same.

Definitely a meme for a romance writer (which [livejournal.com profile] bookchick is). This one turned out - not surprisingly - to be pretty darned tough for me. I managed to come up with 17, which is more than I thought I could scrape together. As I looked through my book and video shelves, I saw works with couples who used to mean a lot to me, but who aren't really part of my present consciousness. Of the ones I could consider "current," several are of my own creation, either through my own writing or gaming.

The top five can not really be sorted in rank:

We're like a coin - with a head on one side and a lion on the other. )

Looking at this list, I see for the first time how very many of my favorites come from different worlds, whose love is a bridging of cultures -- and/or religions -- as well as a uniting of hearts. More than a few find love in scenarios of war or captivity. Only in The Philadelphia Story would the couple be an expected pairing -- two people from the same "world" and the same level of power. And I am surprised at how many of these "couples" are people who love each other in a real and binding way but who never actually become "a couple." (It makes sense, I just never realized how many of my favorites follow that pattern.)

Tagging: [livejournal.com profile] thomryng, [livejournal.com profile] poliphilo, [livejournal.com profile] saskia139, [livejournal.com profile] _storyteller_, and [livejournal.com profile] kateri_thinks -- but everyone is free to play!

ETA: 18. Remington Steele and Laura Holt
qos: (Homemade Queen)
Since I'm having trouble coming up with quality content these days, I'll shamelessly follow after my dear friend [livejournal.com profile] bookchick, with the Interests meme:

Look at your LJ "interests" list. If you have fewer than 50 interests, pick every fifth one. If you have between fifty and seventy-five interests, pick every seventh one. If you have over seventy-five interests, pick every tenth one. If you have fewer than ten, pick all of 'em. List them on your LJ, and tell everyone exactly what it is about these things that interests you so much.

I have 140 interests (some of them redundant).

Beauty and the Beast: I'm a fan of the Disney movie, largely because Belle reminds me very much of the girl I was: coming from a small town, being "not like the rest of us," always reading and dreaming of magical adventures. I've also come to see how often I've acted out the "Beauty and the Beast" relationship pattern in my life: loving men who were "beastly" but believing that if I loved them faithfully and passionately enough they would turn into princes. So far my success rate is 0, and I've resolved to change that pattern.

Comparative Religion: Peoples' religious beliefs fascinate me. The similarities and differences between religions fascinate me. I have a Masters Degree in Comparative Religion, and am working on ways to use that education -- and my eclectic personal spiritual path -- as a basis for workshops and retreats for people who want to learn more about the variety of ways in which people respond to the Divine.

Decadence: I love luxury and sensual excess: lush textures, rich chocolate, fine steaks, long massages, sleeping in followed by breakfast in bed, room service, hours and hours of lovemaking, and all the other delicious, excessive non-essentials in life. I wish I could afford more of them.

Guinevere: Guinevere fascinates me as a mythic figure who has been shaped to serve so many different versions of the Matter of Britain. My favorite versions of her are heroic, most especially her portrayal in Parke Godwin's novels where she is flawed but formidable (excerpt here: http://jsh32.tripod.com/heroines/id7.html). See also: http://jsh32.tripod.com/heroines/id6.html

Inanna: The Descent of Inanna is a powerful myth of initiation and transformation, one which helped me heal after I escaped from an abusive relationship. Inanna is a complex figure, combining the realms of war, sovereignty, prosperity, learning (she won the mes, the arts of civilization, from her father after she got him drunk) and sexuality. My Comparative Religion thesis was about sacred prostitution, a practice which is often linked with her name. (I can explain why this isn't necessarily an accurate perception, but this isn't the place for that discussion.)

Lilith: The third-in-a-row mythic female figure prominent for sexuality and violating boundaries. (And me a seminarian. . . even if I am on leave at the moment. . . ) Lilith appears in the ancient poem Inanna and the huluppu Tree, but attempts to make her a figure of Jewish midrash are erroneous. The Alphabet of Ben Sirach, which is the source for the famous story of her refusing to lie under Adam for sex is actually a satirical work. Still, the story has tremendous power, and I count myself among those who consider Lilith a "patron saint of bad girls" and rebels. During my last semester in college I wrote my own midrash on Lilith, exploring what it was that caused the divine harmony of the first man and woman to be disrupted by Adam's insistence on being on top. It's still one of my favorite pieces of fiction.

Myth: In the academic study of religion, "myth" means "sacred story" not "those quaint stories told those poor, primitive, deluded heathens." Myth is one of the most powerful ways we have to communicate, for good or ill. I want to become better at writing and telling myths.

Prayer: Prayer is talking to the Divine. I go back and forth between formal techniques and spontaneous conversation. I need to do more praying, and I need to get better at praying with others.

Royalty: Ever since I was very young, I've had a very mythic understanding of royalty. I've always seen royalty as a position of ultimate privelege and ultimate responsibility. I started writing stories about hieros gamos/sacred marriage consecrations and king sacrifices before I was out of junior high. On the mythic level, royalty, like the priesthood, is a pivot point between the People and the Divine. (And I'm a Protestant mystic who belives that direct connection to the Divine is the birthright of every human being!) I don't care about modern royals; but something about the ancient practices, especially the Middle Eastern and Celtic, resonates very deep within me.

Shakespeare: I was a theatre major, and I've worked on three production of Hamlet, directed The Taming of the Shrew, and believe -- like many -- that Shakespeare is one of our wisest observers and illuminators of the human experience.

Storytelling: I've written stories since I was very young. I tend to talk in stories and tell stories to provide context for any situation, observation or opinion that I hold. I want to become skilled at oral storytelling, be able to spin tales to delight and provoke young and old alike.

The Stars: The stars have always beckoned to me. I've never been a nature girl, but the night sky mesmerizes me. My "magical" daydreams were not of going to fairyland, but of journeying among the stars. I love the episode in the movie Contact in which Ellie talks about the sounds the different stars make. I love the idea of being intimately familiar with the voices of the stars.

villains: A really good heroic story needs a really impressive villain. As a sometime gamemaster of role-playing games, I am challenged to come up with formidable villains. I find it a challenge not because I don't have villainy in my own heart, but because I'm afraid of what I'll betray about my own shadow side if I really use that part of myself for role-playing. I love a really "good" villain. Croup and Vandermere, from Neverwhere are high on my list of favorites.

Writing: I can talk a blue streak when I'm in the right mood and the right company, but writing is my primary way of expressing the deeper parts of myself, whether through journaling (paper journal or here), writing to friends, writing stories (both for public viewing and my own private explorations), or academic writing. My longest-held dream is to publish a novel.
qos: (Default)
I had the day off from work today to attend the first year M.Divs' Day of Reflection. It was a wonderful day, and I had the time, space and inspiration to do some serious and helpful thinking and praying about my discernment process about the board presidency issue.

More About My Day )
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 05:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios