The Significance of a Skull
Jun. 5th, 2010 03:56 pmI really, really try to be respectful of other peoples' beliefs and perspectives, but sometimes I have a gut-level, knee-jerk reaction of O RLY??
As I think I mentioned recently, I've been exploring some aspects of Magdalene spirituality -- and I really should expect to have a different perspective than many on that path. In addition to her associations with the Holy Grail ("holy blood" aspect optional) and a representative of the Divine Feminine within the Gospel story, I've come to see her as an underworld priestess: one intimately connected to the forces of sex, death and transformation which are central to this work (at least as I do it).
I just picked up a book called Invoking Mary Magdalene: Accessing the Wisdom of the Divine Feminine. I opened it at random and first sentence I read was: As mentioned previously, Mary Magdalene is usually shown with specific accountrements, several of which symbolize her role as wise woman and healer. The skull, one of her ubiquitous emblems, is a potent image for healing. . .
WTF?
In my study of Mary Magdalene, the skull is almost always seen as representing her knowledge of death, sometimes as a rather literal representation of "Golgotha" -- the Hill of the Skull -- where Jesus was crucified. Those who see her as a repentent prostitute sometimes see it as reflecting her awareness of the futility of a carnal life rather than a spiritual one. To quote Hamlet "To this end she must come."
I read a sentence like this one and I wonder about the author's (apparent) absolute rejection of the place of death and suffering in Mary's story. I paged through the book to try and find an acknowledgement of death and suffering elsewhere, but even when the author talks about the "Dark Goddess" aspect of Magdalene, she does so in terms of being the rejected Divine Feminine in Christianity and emphasizing her sexuality rather than going fully into the more terrible aspects of a goddess who is associated with death, or of transformation through ordeal.
Focusing on the bright aspects of Magdalene is not in itself a bad thing. They are there and powerful. It upsets me, however, when I see what I perceive as a twisting of a symbol which is uncomfortable to the author to deny the darker aspects of the story. Which is particularly ironic given the author's acknowledgement of the "shadow" aspect Magdalene carries for Christianity. She herself takes the darkness of Mary's story and pushes it into the shadow of rejection and denial.
As I think I mentioned recently, I've been exploring some aspects of Magdalene spirituality -- and I really should expect to have a different perspective than many on that path. In addition to her associations with the Holy Grail ("holy blood" aspect optional) and a representative of the Divine Feminine within the Gospel story, I've come to see her as an underworld priestess: one intimately connected to the forces of sex, death and transformation which are central to this work (at least as I do it).
I just picked up a book called Invoking Mary Magdalene: Accessing the Wisdom of the Divine Feminine. I opened it at random and first sentence I read was: As mentioned previously, Mary Magdalene is usually shown with specific accountrements, several of which symbolize her role as wise woman and healer. The skull, one of her ubiquitous emblems, is a potent image for healing. . .
WTF?
In my study of Mary Magdalene, the skull is almost always seen as representing her knowledge of death, sometimes as a rather literal representation of "Golgotha" -- the Hill of the Skull -- where Jesus was crucified. Those who see her as a repentent prostitute sometimes see it as reflecting her awareness of the futility of a carnal life rather than a spiritual one. To quote Hamlet "To this end she must come."
I read a sentence like this one and I wonder about the author's (apparent) absolute rejection of the place of death and suffering in Mary's story. I paged through the book to try and find an acknowledgement of death and suffering elsewhere, but even when the author talks about the "Dark Goddess" aspect of Magdalene, she does so in terms of being the rejected Divine Feminine in Christianity and emphasizing her sexuality rather than going fully into the more terrible aspects of a goddess who is associated with death, or of transformation through ordeal.
Focusing on the bright aspects of Magdalene is not in itself a bad thing. They are there and powerful. It upsets me, however, when I see what I perceive as a twisting of a symbol which is uncomfortable to the author to deny the darker aspects of the story. Which is particularly ironic given the author's acknowledgement of the "shadow" aspect Magdalene carries for Christianity. She herself takes the darkness of Mary's story and pushes it into the shadow of rejection and denial.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 12:17 am (UTC)No. Just, no.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 01:55 am (UTC)I wonder if for this person, since almost every book is biased by the author, can only acknowledge that this idea of "Rejected Femine Divine" and sacred sexuality ARE the shadows. I've not read this book, nor know much on the subject, but Christianity doesn't seem to dwell on death on that much, at least in the sense of remaining and working within a death-filled realm (which I don't really view Hell as, and certainly not Heaven).
I hope this made some sense.. I just got home from work.
I guess for some shadows are another's light?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 01:55 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 02:21 pm (UTC)That's a good insight.
I think that how much emphasis there is on death and suffering depends very much on the individual Christian and/or their community. There are those who focus very much on it, although my non-professional impression is that they are the minority. Ultimately, of course, it's Christ's rising from the dead that is seen as the ultimate triumph and the proof of his godhood and thus of the truth and power of his message of salvation.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 04:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 04:52 am (UTC)The author may yet surprise me, but I have the distinct sense that she is working outside the context of that theology.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 05:44 am (UTC)I'm curious as to the reason(s) the author gives for considering it a "potent image for healing."
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 02:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 04:03 pm (UTC)This is the part where the book meets the wall.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-06-06 04:07 pm (UTC)In fact, I'm about to post a prayer/meditation that I think is going to be helpful to me in my ongoing connection to the upperworld.