Ritual Semantics
Oct. 11th, 2009 05:15 amHad a lovely time with LM last night: a simple dinner followed by conversation about ritual.
I was rehashing my resistance to formal ritual as opposed to prayer and meditation, when he suddenly suggested that I consider the difference between reading a script and mounting a full production of a play. Both will communicate the meaning and the emotion of the text, but one is a far more potent experience. I was impressed.
Talk about performance brought Scotty around -- which was nice, because I haven't seen him in quite some time. We discussed the semantic implications regarding approaching ritual as "exhibitionism" rather than "performance." To me, "performance" always carries an association of artificiality, while "exhibitionsim", although usually considered less dignified/worthy/acceptable, carries with it a sense of showing one's raw, authentic self. At least, those are my associations.
I think that right now I feel so lacking in skill in ritual that the idea of putting on an effective "performance" only adds to my stress and resistance. As my skills increase they will become more natural, more part of me, and that distinction between performance and exhibitionism will fade. To go back to the metaphor of the play, the effectiveness is certainly increased when the actors are skillful performers rather than just sincere amateurs.
Not sure how deep or important this will be in the long run, but it was an enjoyable conversation and gave me some insights into myself and some of my biases.
I was rehashing my resistance to formal ritual as opposed to prayer and meditation, when he suddenly suggested that I consider the difference between reading a script and mounting a full production of a play. Both will communicate the meaning and the emotion of the text, but one is a far more potent experience. I was impressed.
Talk about performance brought Scotty around -- which was nice, because I haven't seen him in quite some time. We discussed the semantic implications regarding approaching ritual as "exhibitionism" rather than "performance." To me, "performance" always carries an association of artificiality, while "exhibitionsim", although usually considered less dignified/worthy/acceptable, carries with it a sense of showing one's raw, authentic self. At least, those are my associations.
I think that right now I feel so lacking in skill in ritual that the idea of putting on an effective "performance" only adds to my stress and resistance. As my skills increase they will become more natural, more part of me, and that distinction between performance and exhibitionism will fade. To go back to the metaphor of the play, the effectiveness is certainly increased when the actors are skillful performers rather than just sincere amateurs.
Not sure how deep or important this will be in the long run, but it was an enjoyable conversation and gave me some insights into myself and some of my biases.
