Authority Milestone
Jan. 10th, 2008 05:24 amI hit an important milestone of personal growth recently.
Another LJ member is teaching a class at Pantheacon on a topic very similar to mine. I've read her journal once or twice, but had decided that I wasn't going to read the book she's published until after the conference, because otherwise I'd end up second-guessing myself and worrying about being too close or too different from what she has to say.
But then I thought, Wait a minute! Why am I allowing her to be the standard? Why would I let myself see her that way?
Owning my own authority has been a long struggle -- one still not complete -- but this is a huge step forward.
The worth of what I have to say is in no way dependent on what other people have to say on the same topic. If all I can do is look to others for validation for my ideas, I don't have anything original to contribute, and so there's no point to my stepping forward. If I do have something original, then I shouldn't worry about making sure I'm in line with the thoughts of others. I should be clear about where I need to make a case for my opinions based on how well my ideas follow generally accepted wisdom, and about where I'm staking new territory.
It should be the new territory that's exciting and what makes me worth paying attention to, not how well I can rehash the safe ground that someone else is covering.
Another LJ member is teaching a class at Pantheacon on a topic very similar to mine. I've read her journal once or twice, but had decided that I wasn't going to read the book she's published until after the conference, because otherwise I'd end up second-guessing myself and worrying about being too close or too different from what she has to say.
But then I thought, Wait a minute! Why am I allowing her to be the standard? Why would I let myself see her that way?
Owning my own authority has been a long struggle -- one still not complete -- but this is a huge step forward.
The worth of what I have to say is in no way dependent on what other people have to say on the same topic. If all I can do is look to others for validation for my ideas, I don't have anything original to contribute, and so there's no point to my stepping forward. If I do have something original, then I shouldn't worry about making sure I'm in line with the thoughts of others. I should be clear about where I need to make a case for my opinions based on how well my ideas follow generally accepted wisdom, and about where I'm staking new territory.
It should be the new territory that's exciting and what makes me worth paying attention to, not how well I can rehash the safe ground that someone else is covering.