Almost Speechless
Mar. 12th, 2005 08:22 amEdited, to quote
thomryng:
"It's official. We're beating our ploughshares into swords."
I don't usually post about politics since I have an aversion to expressing opinions regarding complicated subjects on which I don't have all the facts. But the first thing I read this morning was an AP article with the headline "Congress Mulls Cutting Food Aid to the Poor."
The article reads, in part (and I'm pulling from the middle): Bush is proposing to withdraw food stamps for certain families already receiving other government assistance. The administration estimates that plan would remove more than 300,000 people from the rolls and save $113 million annually.
Chambliss said minimal changes in all three areas of agriculture spending — nutrition, farm supports and conservation — could save what's needed. "I want this to be as painless to every farmer in America as we can make it," he said.
As opposed to the money they could save and the "pain reduction" they could achieve by pulling troops out of Iraq??
Let's rob from the poor and give to the war.
Let's consume more of our dwindling natural resources so we continue to kill more human beings.
What in the hell are these people thinkig?
I may not have all the facts, but I can't consider it anything less than criminal that congress is talking about cutting aid to our own people and our natural resources while continuing to throw money into the war in Iraq. How many millions could they save by bringing just one company of soldiers home?
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
I don't usually post about politics since I have an aversion to expressing opinions regarding complicated subjects on which I don't have all the facts. But the first thing I read this morning was an AP article with the headline "Congress Mulls Cutting Food Aid to the Poor."
The article reads, in part (and I'm pulling from the middle): Bush is proposing to withdraw food stamps for certain families already receiving other government assistance. The administration estimates that plan would remove more than 300,000 people from the rolls and save $113 million annually.
Chambliss said minimal changes in all three areas of agriculture spending — nutrition, farm supports and conservation — could save what's needed. "I want this to be as painless to every farmer in America as we can make it," he said.
As opposed to the money they could save and the "pain reduction" they could achieve by pulling troops out of Iraq??
Let's rob from the poor and give to the war.
Let's consume more of our dwindling natural resources so we continue to kill more human beings.
What in the hell are these people thinkig?
I may not have all the facts, but I can't consider it anything less than criminal that congress is talking about cutting aid to our own people and our natural resources while continuing to throw money into the war in Iraq. How many millions could they save by bringing just one company of soldiers home?